A company says it has successfully tested out a <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley cup</a> n electric aircraft meant to be used as a flying taxi for short-distance travel in urban centers.The Chinese company XPeng did a test flight in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates on Monday in front of the city s <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley vaso</a> Marina District. The flight was unmanned, but the Guangzhou-based Chinese company says it already tested a passenger flight using the aircraft last year.XPeng Motor s electric air vehicle carried two passengers and would be useful in high-traffic scenarios like a helicopter, <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pl>stanley cup</a> but it appears to fly more in the style of a large drone. The taxi, called X2, is just one of many flying car projects beingtested worldwide. 150 spectators were at the promotional event to watch the craft being tested, filming the scene on their smartphones.The company says the craft can cruise at around 81 miles per hour and can go as high as 1,000 meters above the ground. Nvwm Florida prosecutor faces scrutiny after TV crew attack
A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Friday threw out a Trump administration policy barring migrants who illegally crossed the border from seeking asylum, finding that it violated the Immigration and Nationality Act.The administration s policy, signed last November, aimed to temporarily bar migrants who illegally cross into the US through the southern border from seeking asylum outside of official ports of entry. <A>liens have a statutory right to seek asylum regardless of whether they enter the United States at a designated port of entry, a <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk>stanley mug</a> nd defendants may not extinguish that statutory right by regulation or proclamation, wrote District Judge Randolph Moss, an Obama appointe <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk>stanley flask</a> e.Late last year, a federal judge in California blocked Trump s asylum ban and the Supreme Court later upheld the judge s order. Today s decision is a big deal for what it portends -- that the administration s new asylum policy is likely to be wiped off the books, said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. But its practical impact will be more modest, because the policy was already on hold thanks to a nationwide injunction against it from a California court -- one that the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, refused to stay last <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.cz>stanley termoska</a> December. Last December, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the four liberal ju