2 weeks ago
#424984 Quote
Fhsc Dems Fight Over Fla., Mich. Delegates
She played a disturbed and homicidal leading lady in 1987 s highest grossing film,  Fatal Attraction,  but Glenn Close now fears her portrayal of Alex Forrest contributed to media stigmas surrounding mental illness.Close told CBS News she would read the script and play the character differently now - even though her portrayal earned her a Best Actress Academy Award nomination. I was in Fatal Attraction and that played into the stigma,  Close said.  I would have a different outlook on that character.           <a href=https://www.stanleymugs.us>stanley flask</a>                                I asked Close if she read the script differently now. I would read that script totally differently,  Close said.  The astounding thing was that in my research for Fatal Attraction I <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pl>stanley cup</a>  talked to two psychiatrists. Never did a mental disorder come up. Never did the possibility of that come up. That, of course, would be the first thing I would think of now.         In the movie, Close s character, Forrest, sought revenge on a married man with whom she had a brief sexual encounter. She first sought to hold onto the relationship but eventually became so obsessed with her lover, Dan Gallagher, played by Michael Douglas, that she briefly kidnaps  <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley flasche</a> Gallagher s daughter and tries to kill his wife and Gallagher. Close s portrayal of Forrest ranks No. 7 on the American Film Institute s list of top 100 heroes and villians.Though Close says the psychiatrists she consulted before playing the role never mentioned a specific mental disorder, subsequent intervie Tpgk FBI sources: Sony Pictures cyberattack traced to North Korea
To prevent a break in production, the Navy is backtracking on recently  <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley mug</a> hatched plans for shipbuilding.The Navy had long planned to buy seven modernized DDG-1000, Zumwalt-class destroyers. But just last month, the service decided to halt the purchase at two and instead buy up to nine older-model Arleigh Burke-class ships.In a move sure to please Sen. Susan Collins  R-Maine , a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and long an advocate for the new model destroyers, the Navy now wants to buy one more of the new Zumwalt-class vessels, which are expected to cost between $2 billion and $4 billion. Some of the ships are built at General Dynamics Bath Iron Works in Maine.                                        Navy Secretary Donald Winter explained his reasoningmdash; it was simply too late in the annual budget cycle to change what the Navy asked for in February.Congressional appropriators sent their own signal on the issue before the A <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.us>stanley water jug</a> ugust recess. The House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee provided partial funding for the Zumwalt-class ship, but not for the older model ships. Senate appropriators have not taken a crack at the def <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley mug</a> ense budget.        We have a presidentrsquo  budget on the Hill, which calls for a third DDG-1000, Winter said in an interview today. We want to be able to continue production of surface combatants, particularly destroyers. We want to avoid any gap, if you will, that would impact the industrial base or the fleet.  
0