Guys Top Democrat calls for IRS resignations
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was asked Friday about Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who told CBS News on Thursday that he is looking at a presidential bid in 2016.Her pithy response: Was he serious GOP Rep. Peter King weighing 2016 presidential runDim prospects for comprehensive immigration bill in HouseThe reporters in the briefing room chuckled as Pelosi pressed on. He s a great guy, I mean, I like him personally and the rest, she explained. It s a long way off for us. We don t even have a jobs bill six and a half months into this term. We don t have any results to show the American people for what s happening. <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk>stanley cups uk</a> She suggested that the House should focus on legislating, not presidential politics, reciting a to-do list including immigration reform, bac <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley quencher</a> kground checks for gun buyers, and a jobs bill.On Thursda <a href=https://www.stanley1913.com.es>vaso stanley</a> y, King suggested he was pondering a bid in 2016 because he s worried about the influence of isolationists within the GOP like Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas. They re the only ones who are talking about foreign policy and they are doing it from a very backward point of view, he said, calling their platform very damaging to the Republican Party and to the country. ponent--type-recirculation .item:nth-child 5 display: none; inline-recirc-item--id-63776a0e-3597-11e3-8ce8-047d7b15b92e, right-rail-recirc- Vtbb Arizona Senate passes birther bill
We ve all <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley trinkflaschen</a> heard a lot of talk, in this primary season that is near its end, about how George W. Bush beat John McCain in the Republican primaries by running as the more conservative candidate. This came as a surprise to some people since, before the primary campaign, McCain s record suggested that he was the more conservative of the two.But an influential group of Republicans saw George Bush as the conservative candidate from the beginning, and backed him in large part because of it. Not conservative ideologically. Conservative strategically.Many were the Wednesday-morning quarterbacks wh <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.it>stanley borraccia</a> o, after Super Tuesday, clucked that the Republicans had punted by giving their primary votes to George W. Bush instead of John McCain. John McCain, these folks said, would have been the better, bolder choice for the general election, and they d show you polls that had McCain at his height doing at least as well as Bush in a showdown with Gore. These voices revel in the irony that Bush s first big selling point was that he <a href=https://www.stanleycup.com.se>stanley termosar</a> was the man who could beat Gore. In the Bush family idiom, the invincibility thing.Well, no one s invincible. But those in the Republican establishment who have put their money on Bush and who have worked hard to make sure rank-and-file GOP voters do the same aren t as out of touch with reality as some have made them out to be. Not by half. What the Republican back-roomers have always held in sight is the simple fact that
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was asked Friday about Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who told CBS News on Thursday that he is looking at a presidential bid in 2016.Her pithy response: Was he serious GOP Rep. Peter King weighing 2016 presidential runDim prospects for comprehensive immigration bill in HouseThe reporters in the briefing room chuckled as Pelosi pressed on. He s a great guy, I mean, I like him personally and the rest, she explained. It s a long way off for us. We don t even have a jobs bill six and a half months into this term. We don t have any results to show the American people for what s happening. <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk>stanley cups uk</a> She suggested that the House should focus on legislating, not presidential politics, reciting a to-do list including immigration reform, bac <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley quencher</a> kground checks for gun buyers, and a jobs bill.On Thursda <a href=https://www.stanley1913.com.es>vaso stanley</a> y, King suggested he was pondering a bid in 2016 because he s worried about the influence of isolationists within the GOP like Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas. They re the only ones who are talking about foreign policy and they are doing it from a very backward point of view, he said, calling their platform very damaging to the Republican Party and to the country. ponent--type-recirculation .item:nth-child 5 display: none; inline-recirc-item--id-63776a0e-3597-11e3-8ce8-047d7b15b92e, right-rail-recirc- Vtbb Arizona Senate passes birther bill
We ve all <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley trinkflaschen</a> heard a lot of talk, in this primary season that is near its end, about how George W. Bush beat John McCain in the Republican primaries by running as the more conservative candidate. This came as a surprise to some people since, before the primary campaign, McCain s record suggested that he was the more conservative of the two.But an influential group of Republicans saw George Bush as the conservative candidate from the beginning, and backed him in large part because of it. Not conservative ideologically. Conservative strategically.Many were the Wednesday-morning quarterbacks wh <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.it>stanley borraccia</a> o, after Super Tuesday, clucked that the Republicans had punted by giving their primary votes to George W. Bush instead of John McCain. John McCain, these folks said, would have been the better, bolder choice for the general election, and they d show you polls that had McCain at his height doing at least as well as Bush in a showdown with Gore. These voices revel in the irony that Bush s first big selling point was that he <a href=https://www.stanleycup.com.se>stanley termosar</a> was the man who could beat Gore. In the Bush family idiom, the invincibility thing.Well, no one s invincible. But those in the Republican establishment who have put their money on Bush and who have worked hard to make sure rank-and-file GOP voters do the same aren t as out of touch with reality as some have made them out to be. Not by half. What the Republican back-roomers have always held in sight is the simple fact that
0