1 week ago
#425963 Quote
Isog Refugee admissions from all countries to resume with new vetting rules
In conducting official business, senior White House officials sometimes used private email accounts, CBS News confirms.These communications were initiated  <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.de>stanley cup</a> largely by people outside the White House seeking to arrange meetings with senior White House staff. Often, individuals asking for a meeting had an existing e-mail relationship with the White House official. For example, a Republican senator might email former RNC chairman and then-White House chief of staff Reince Priebus on his personal account because that s how they communicated before Priebus joined the administration.The New York Times first reported the email accounts and pointed toPriebus and former chief strategist Steve Bannon as being among those using the private accounts. It also reported that Chief Economic Adviser Gary D. Cohn and senior adviser Stephen Miller sent or received at least a few emails on personal accounts. Officials say Ivanka Trump also used a private account while she was transitioning into her role as senior adviser.                               <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cups uk</a>           Late Monday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders explained how White House personnel are instructed to handle work-related communication. All White House personnel have been instructed to use official email to conduct all government related work,  Sanders said in an email to CBS News.  They are further instructed that if they recei <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley france</a> ve work-related communication on personal accounts, they should be forwarded to official email ac Bqno Judge chastises Rick Gates for legal defense fundraiser video
House Democratic leaders have proposed adding a tax surcharge on couples making over $1 millio <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley quencher</a> n in order to pay for an expansion of veterans  education benefits included in an upcoming war supplemental spending bill, a House Democratic aide confirmed on Tuesday.If accepted, the compromise would break the logjam within the House Democratic caucus on the massive $183 billion bill to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.Last week a group of fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats delayed consideration of the supplemental over the veterans  benefits issue, ar <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.de>stanley isolierkanne</a> guing that the cost of the expansion of education benefits to returning war veterans was not offset in the bill.                                         Alt <a href=https://www.stanleycup.com.se>stanley termosar</a> hough specific details of the proposal were not available, the aide indicated it would be a .5% tax on income for couples over $1 million, which would raise $54 billion over 10 years.The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the expansion of veterans  education benefits would cost $51.8 billion over the next 10 years.        As the House Democratic leadership met on Tuesday night to discuss the plan, there was no word if the Blue Dogs would accept the compromise and drop their objections to the supplemental. Democratic Rep. Allen Boyd of Florida, a co-chair of the Blue Dogs, said he would support the package with these offsets included. He and a handful of other Blue Dogs were threatening to block consideration of the legislation, which will come to the floor as a s
0