The Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee said again on Wednesday that there is no evidence to support President Trumprsquo claim that his phones were tapped during the campaign on the orders of President Obama.But U.S Rep. Devin Nunes did reveal Wednesday that after the election, Mr. Trump and some of his aides were intercepted speaking to foreign officials. Nunes said the intelligence intercepts were routine and lawful, but the committee chairman took the unusual step of briefing Mr. Trump. House Intel Chair: May have been incid <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley flasche</a> ental collection of Trump communications 04:22 I recently confirmed that on numerous occasions the intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition, Nunes said Wednesday. Nunes said he had seen about a dozen intercepted communications involving members of the Trump transition team, CBS Newsrsquo; Margaret Brennan reports. That means either Trump associates - or Mr. Trump himself - wer <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley canada</a> e in contact with foreigners under surveillance or the foreigners were dis <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cups uk</a> cussing the Trump team. Trump feels somewhat vindicated by Rep. Nunes comment Plxz 2020 Daily Trail Markers: Warren and Sanders set to take the gloves off at Tuesday s debate
TIME <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley canada</a> FOR THE AP TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR.... About half way through Barack Obama s convention speech last night, he told his audience, That s the promise we need to keep. That s the change we need right now. So let me spell out exactly what that change would mean if I am President. He did just that, with an emphasis on depth. Taxes, healthcare, energy policy, education -- Obama left little doubt about what he would do if elected. Indeed, the emphasis on details, which his detractors have said is a weak point in his campaign, was hard to miss. Chris Cillizza said, Obama s speech was more substance than style; more specifics than rhetorical flourish. Greg Sargent said the speech was strong because of its specificity. Robert Gordon and James Kvaal added, In its depth and detail, his speech resembled a State of the Union address more than a typical stump speech. And yet, there was the Associated Press, doing what it s <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.at>stanley thermoskannen</a> been doing far too often: parroting the Republican line.B <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cups uk</a> arack Obama, whose campaign theme is change we can believe in, promised Thursday to spell out exactly what that change would mean. But instead of dwelling on specifics, he laced the crowning speech of his long campaign with the type of rhetorical flourishes that Republicans mock and the attacks on John McCain that Democrats cheer. <>..]The crowd at Invesco Field cheered deliriously, but Republicans almost surely will decry the lack of specifics.This is utter nonsense. Obama detailed his policy vision in