1 week ago
#426036 Quote
Dria Border Patrol agents now screening migrants for  credible fear  under controversial pilot program
The government s top infectious disease expert may be under pressure for appearing to contradict President Trump. Over the weekend, Dr. Anthony Fauci suggested lives could ha <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pl>stanley kubek</a> ve been saved if the president had acted sooner on warnings about the coronavirus pandemic.It started when The New York Times reported that the president was warned about a pandemic at the end of January, and that top officials wanted to implement social distancing in February.Fauci seemed to corroborate that on Sunday when he said lives could have been saved if the U.S. had promoted social distancing in February.                                         I mean, obviously, if we had mdash; right from the very beginning <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.us>stanley flask</a>  mdash; shut everything down, it may have been a little bit different,  Fauci told CNN.  But there was a lot of pushback about shutting things down back then.  On Twitter late Su <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley cup</a> nday night, the president pushed back against The New York Times story as  fake news,  and re-tweeted a tweet that included the hashtag  FireFauci.        That same tweet included a reference to a February 29 press conference where Fauci claimed the U.S. was overall at low risk mdash; even though Fauci also said the situation was changing.CBS  News White House correspondent Paula Reid reports that over the past  few days, and as recently as Monday morning, the president has been calling  associates  seeking their input on how soon he should open the economy and asking  what they think of Dr. Fauci.In a statement pr Lsgl Hillary Clinton campaign: Bernie Sanders out-raised us in January
An advocacy group for gays in the military is warning them not to answer a Pentagon survey seeking opinions on repeal of the policy that bans homosexuals from serving openly.The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network said Thursday that troops could be accidentally exposed by answering the survey and that the Defense Department has not agreed to grant immunity should that happen.The survey was e-mailed to 400,000 service members as part of a wider review by a special working group that is studying how repeal of the policy might be implemented and how it could aff <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley spain</a> ect the military.                                        The Pentagon says the survey is confidential and is being done by an outside contractor who will strip out all identifying data.  They cannot be outed,  said Cynthia Smith, a Pentagon spokeswoman.The legal defense group said it s not so sure.         At this time SLDN cannot recommend that lesbian, gay, or bisexual service members participate in any survey being administered by the Department of Defense, the Pentagon Working Group, or any third-party contractors,  Aubrey Sarvis, the defense group s director, said in a statement.Smith noted that the survey doesn t ask whether a respondent is gay. It asks questions about their overall experience in the military, their experience in serving with people they believed were gay and their attitudes about how a change in the  <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley quencher</a> law might affect recruiting, privacy, unit cohesion and so on.Officials stressed that the surve <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de>stanley cups</a> y is
0