California Democratic Rep. Anna Eshoo, the first member of Congress to hear the allegations of sexual misconduct against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, says it took extraordinary courage for her constituent Christine Blasey Ford to step forward, and she should be given the respect she deserves as she prepares to tell the Senate Judiciary Committee her story. Eshoo said she met with Ford at her district office for about an hour and a half over the summer while Forddescribed her alleged encounter with Kavanaugh in the early 1980s. She alleges Kavanaugh pinned her down and groped her on a bed at a party while the two were in high school. Kavanaugh has strenuously denied ever doing so and has <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk>stanley cups uk</a> said he is willing to testify publicly and defend himself. Transcript: Rep. Anna Eshoo on Face the Nation, September 23, 2018 My impression of her was she was intelligent. She spoke softly. It was wrenching for her, I think, to tell the story because there s a re-experience when the story is told, Eshoo said on Face the Nation Sunday. She went into many details and at the end of our <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.it>stanley tumblers</a> conversation I told her that I believed her and that it was important she tell me if, what she wished me to do with information, if in fact she ch <a href=https://www.stanleycup.cz>stanley cup</a> ose another path. And she did. She wanted me to take it down a different pathway, and of course with anonymity and privacy, that s paramount in sexual abuse allegations or cases because the individuals are terrified. Ford lat Gmxp Supreme Court won t hear Planned Parenthood funding case
AP Photo/Paul Sakuma The Ohio Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that cops can t search a suspect s mobile phone during an arrest. While this decision took the pro-privacy view, it highlights how this important privacy question remains unresolved.Most people have probably figured out that handheld gadgets and laptops know us better than our spouses do. They know whom we talk to, which Web sites we visit, whose e-mail we ignore, and with a little extra smarts, they could probably offer an educated guess about what we d prefer for dinner tonight.To snatch these useful little devices from our homes, police need warrants. But if we happen to be arrested with gadgets in our pocket or purse, police and prosecutors say they have the righ <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.de>stanley thermobecher</a> t to peruse what could be gigabytes of data for potentially incriminating files or photographs.That vast collection of data lures police as surely as a $78 Blu-ray player lures Wal-Mart shoppers, and courts have split on whether it s pe <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.it>stanley italia</a> rmissible or not. The U.S. Constitution s Fourth Amendment, of course, prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. In general, a search without a warrant is viewed as unreasonable; searches when a person is arrested are an exception to that general rule.But a 32 GB iPhone <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.pl>stanley kubek</a> can store more information than can be found in most home bookshelves and filing cabinets the complete works of Shakespeare takes up only about 1/100th of a gigabyte . So an analogy to the old you-can-search-th