WASHINGTON -- Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday that he has still not been shown the evidence of Russian <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup becher</a> meddling in last year s presidential election. I know nothing but what I ve read in the paper, Sessions said at Tuesday sSenate Intelligence Committee hearing. I ve never received any detail, briefing on how hacking occurr <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk>stanley quencher</a> ed or how information was alleged to have influenced the campaign, he said. James Comey: No doubt Russia interfered in 2016 election 01:14 The intelligence community, including the FBI, concluded late last year that the Russian government s cyberattacks were designed to help the Trump campaign. Now, CBS News has learned that those efforts were even greater than previously reported. During the final weeks of the campaign, former U.S. officials say hackers tried to gain access to voter databases in more than two dozen states. And they were successful in Illinois. Election databases in several states were at risk during 2016 presidential campaign This is the first time we re aware of that anyone has ever successfully gotten in, said Ken Menzel, the general counsel of the Illinois Board of Elections, in August. The state noticed the intrusions last summer. We <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley cup</a> re highly confident that no records were deleted or altered or Kngq FBI Opens Foley E-Mail Probe
This story was written by Rosaleen O Sullivan, D <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley canada</a> aily TrojanIn fewer than 30 days, marriage licenses will be issued to gay couples across the state of California -- unless, of course, opponents of the new ruling ask the California Supreme Court to rehear the case. If the high court accepts, the wait period is undeterminable, and even if it declines, licenses will be denied for up to 90 days. If the court denies the request to rehear the case or agrees with its original decision, many happy couples will receive the full rights now granted to them - that is, unless a proposed constitutional amendment that would overturn the court s decision qualifies for the November ballot. In that case, Californians could nullify their own Supreme Court s ruling and the fight for gay marriage could once again be lost in piles of legal documentation. In re Marriage cases might very well go down in history as a moment of critical judicial activism on a <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley becher</a> question of national cultural and moral standards. They might one day be compared in history textbooks to Roe v. Wade, the decision that sparked the modern war on abortion, or perhaps Loving v. Virginia, in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared a ban on interracial marriage unconstitutional. Thursday, May 15, 2008, the day the California court gave its decision, will go down not just Californian, but in American history -- the question is only whether or <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley vaso</a> not it will mark t