The following i <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley cup</a> s a transcript of an interview with Rep. Mike Lawler, Republican of New York, on Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan that aired on Oct. 20, 2024.MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face The Nation. We go now to Republican Congressman Mike Lawler of New York, good <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley water bottle</a> morning and welcome to the show.REP. M <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley spain</a> IKE LAWLER: Good morning, Margaret, thanks for having me. MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure, you are in a competitive race in your Hudson Valley area. We know two years ago, Republicans flipped four seats in the state of New York and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi said it was New York that cost Democrats the majority. Your seat was one of them. So given all of the infighting within the Republican Party right now, what is your affirmative argument to your voters potentially here that Republicans should retain control REP. LAWLER: Well, look, we re in a deeply divided government. Obviously, Democrats control the Senate and the White House right now, Republicans control the House. Regardless of the outcome in November, we re still going to have very tight margins, whether it s in the House or the Senate, and I ve proven myself to be a bipartisan legislator. I ve been rated the fourth most bipartisan member of Congress. I ve passed 10 bills, five of which have been signed into law by President Biden. The voters in my district understand that I will work tirelessly to get things done on their behalf, working with Republicans and Democrats and Ysru Michigan man mows 58,000 square-foot ldquo;TRUMP rdquo; sign into lawn
The furor surrounding Barack Obamarsquo comments about bitter small-town vot <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley thermosflasche</a> ers and their faith clouds an emerging storyline that stood to benefit either Democratic candidate at Republican John McCainrsquo expense. That narrative was an ironic twist on longstanding partisan stereotypes, a November election that figured to be between a Democrat who is comfortable talking about faith and a Republican who is not. But the Illinois senatorrsquo controversial remarks about <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley canada</a> bitter small-town Pennsylvanians who cling to religion and other cultural stances out of economic despairmdash;comments immediately characterized by New York Sen. Hillary Clinton and McCain as condescendingmdash;have suddenly reintroduced an unwelcome issue, undermining the progress made by a concerted Democratic party outreach to religious voters and reinvigorating criticism that the effort to woo religious voters is more rh <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.de>stanley isolierkanne</a> etoric than substance. The danger, frankly, is that Democrats will be perceived as disingenuous, said Laura Olson, a Clemson University professor who focuses on politics and religion. What I really would be concerned about there is that Republicans could really spin this and they could say Obama is a Marxist. Thatrsquo what Marx said, itrsquo the opiate of the masses. Democratsrsquo; newfound openness on faith began as an attempt to close the partyrsquo disadvanta