Democratic Rep. Julia Carson, who announced over the weekend that she has terminal lung cancer, will not run for a seventh term, her chief of staff said Monday. She does not plan to seek re-election in 2008, said the spokesman, Len Sistek.Carson, 69, was hospitalized for about a week in late September for a de <a href=https://www.stanleymugs.us>stanley flask</a> ep infection near where a leg vein was removed in 1997 when she underwent double heart bypass surgery. She was still recuperating from that ailment and had not yet returned to Wash <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.ca>stanley canada</a> ington when `the second shoe fell - heavily, Carson said in a statement to The Indianapolis Star Sunday. My doctor discovered lung cancer. It had gone <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pl>stanley polska</a> into remission years before, but it was back with a terminal vengeance. Carson did not disclose the date of her initial lung cancer diagnosis. Sistek said he could not discuss Carson s health.Over the years, Carson has suffered from high blood pressure, asthma and diabetes. She spent the weekend before the 2004 election in the hospital for what she said was a flu shot reaction - but still won re-election by 10 percentage points.She became the first black and first woman to represent Indianapolis in Congress when she was elected from the predominantly Democratic 7th District in 1996. Carson has championed children s issues, women s rights and efforts to reduce homelessness and has been a staunch opponent of the war in Iraq.She began her political career in the 1960s when then-Rep. Andy Jacobs Jr. h Mrfi I-Team: Parents furious after school fails to notify them of a sex offense investigation
Congressional Democrats responded to three major 5-4 Supreme Court decisions this week that went against them with vehement criticism, including one lawmaker who deemed the court an arm of the Republican Party. The Janus v. AFSCME ruling handed down Wednesday, which could fundamentally change how public sector unions operate, is the third this week to be decided by the court s conservative majority. Those decisions have led to Democrats in Congress bemoaning the court s political swing, even before Justice Anthony Kennedy s decision to retire, where President Donald Trump will presumably pick a more conservative justice to replace Kennedy, considered a key swing vote.Rep. Adam Smith, Democrat of Washington, said before the Kennedy decision that this week shows that the Supreme Court is no longer a judicial body, but <a href=https://www.adidas-yeezy.it>yeezy slide</a> rather an arm of the Republican Party. Whe <a href=https://www.skecher.com.de>skechers arbeitsschuhe</a> ther you re talking about voting rights... gerrymandering... unions, civil rights, in the case of the Washington court case on the right to not do business with LGBT people, Smith told reporters, adding, every decision they ve made has simply been a rubber sta <a href=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.it>adidas samba og</a> mp for the Republican agenda. Smith is joined in his criticism of the court s Republican agenda by many other Democrats in Congress. Instead of applying clear legal precedent and practical reasoning to uphold the rights of public-sector unions, the court s conservatives have sought to dismantle them by violating decades of legal precedent, said Rep. Bobby Sc