Yprm Religious freedom group outraged over Space Force Bible blessing at National Cathedral
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Judge Amy Coney Barrett s nominati <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley canada</a> on to the Supreme Court on Thursday, clearing the way for a full Senate vote in the week before the election.All 12 Republicans on the committee voted to advance the nomination, while all 10 Democrats boycotted the vote. With Democrats absent, large photographs of people who rely on the Affordable Care Act for their health care were placed in front of their empty chairs at the meeting. Democrats have raised concerns that Barrett would vote to overturn the ACA if confirmed to the court, given <a href=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us>stanley website</a> her previous criticism of a ruling upholding the law.However, the Democrats boycott did not stop Republicans from moving forward with her nomination. At the meeting on Thursday morning, Graham said that it was Democrats choice to boycott the vote, but we re not going to allow them to take over the committee. Graham, who is currently embroiled in a tough reelection fight, said that confirming a conservative justice made up for the difficulties of being a senator. It s moments like this that make everything you go through matter, Graham said. This is a groundbreaking, historic moment for the American legal community and really politically. Graham also reminded Democrats that they were the first to change the rules around confirming judicial nominees in 2013, <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley tumblers</a> when then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option to require only 51 votes to confir Cjca Intel Reform Up To House Leaders
Rep. Doc Hastings R-Wash. , ranking member of the House ethics committee, released a letter today outlining concerns by the staff of the committee with the Democratic proposal to create a new Office of Congressional Ethics. The Hastings letter included a series of issues raised back in November, before the resolution draftd by Rep. Micha <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley canada</a> el Capuano D-Mass. , was publicly released. Ken Kellner, senior counsel to the ethics committee, cited several areas in a Nov. 9 e-mail where he believes the OCE could run into conflicts with the ethics committee or a criminal investigation by the Justice Department.Pointing to the fact that OCE can also interview witnesses in ethics cases, although it does not have have subpoena power like the committee, Kellner suggested the interview of witnesses by both the new entity and the Committee might result in conflicting statements that would undermine the value of testimon <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pt>stanley portugal</a> y from that witness. Kellner also objected to the the fact that the OCE would turn over materials to any member or staff when it sends a case to the ethics committee. In his view, this is a bad idea for the Committee s purposes that the written report and findings of the board be transmitted both to the Committee and to the individual under review. This will provide info <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley quencher</a> rmation to a potential respondent at an inappropriate stage, including alerting the respondent as to witnesses who have been identified as potential recipients of su
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Judge Amy Coney Barrett s nominati <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley canada</a> on to the Supreme Court on Thursday, clearing the way for a full Senate vote in the week before the election.All 12 Republicans on the committee voted to advance the nomination, while all 10 Democrats boycotted the vote. With Democrats absent, large photographs of people who rely on the Affordable Care Act for their health care were placed in front of their empty chairs at the meeting. Democrats have raised concerns that Barrett would vote to overturn the ACA if confirmed to the court, given <a href=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us>stanley website</a> her previous criticism of a ruling upholding the law.However, the Democrats boycott did not stop Republicans from moving forward with her nomination. At the meeting on Thursday morning, Graham said that it was Democrats choice to boycott the vote, but we re not going to allow them to take over the committee. Graham, who is currently embroiled in a tough reelection fight, said that confirming a conservative justice made up for the difficulties of being a senator. It s moments like this that make everything you go through matter, Graham said. This is a groundbreaking, historic moment for the American legal community and really politically. Graham also reminded Democrats that they were the first to change the rules around confirming judicial nominees in 2013, <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley tumblers</a> when then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option to require only 51 votes to confir Cjca Intel Reform Up To House Leaders
Rep. Doc Hastings R-Wash. , ranking member of the House ethics committee, released a letter today outlining concerns by the staff of the committee with the Democratic proposal to create a new Office of Congressional Ethics. The Hastings letter included a series of issues raised back in November, before the resolution draftd by Rep. Micha <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley canada</a> el Capuano D-Mass. , was publicly released. Ken Kellner, senior counsel to the ethics committee, cited several areas in a Nov. 9 e-mail where he believes the OCE could run into conflicts with the ethics committee or a criminal investigation by the Justice Department.Pointing to the fact that OCE can also interview witnesses in ethics cases, although it does not have have subpoena power like the committee, Kellner suggested the interview of witnesses by both the new entity and the Committee might result in conflicting statements that would undermine the value of testimon <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pt>stanley portugal</a> y from that witness. Kellner also objected to the the fact that the OCE would turn over materials to any member or staff when it sends a case to the ethics committee. In his view, this is a bad idea for the Committee s purposes that the written report and findings of the board be transmitted both to the Committee and to the individual under review. This will provide info <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley quencher</a> rmation to a potential respondent at an inappropriate stage, including alerting the respondent as to witnesses who have been identified as potential recipients of su
0