Tocj Caught on camera: Blow-up over BBQ smoke goes viral
Films from major studios included more LGBTQ characters onscreen for longer amounts of time in 2020 compared to the year prior, according to an annual study conducted by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation GLAAD . But the organization said there s still progress to be made, especially when it comes to transge <a href=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us>stanley cup</a> nder and bisexual representation.The 9th Annual Studio Responsibility Index included films from eight major studios: Lionsgate, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures, STX Films, United Artists Releasing, Universal Pictures, the Walt Disney Studios and Warner Bros.Of the 44 films those studios released in 2020, 22.7% included LGBTQ+ characters, a 4% increase from 2019. Though there were fewer LGBTQ characters overall mdash; 20 compared to 50 in 2019 mdash; the organization attributed that to the steep decline in fi <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.pl>stanley cup</a> lms released that year due to the coronavirus pandemic. Of the 20 characters, half spent ten minutes or more on screen, GLAAD said. Thirty percent logged under a minute.LGBTQ characters of color also incre <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley cup</a> ased their presence. Forty percent of the year s LGBTQ characters were people of color, an increase of 6% from the year prior. Fifteen percent were Asian-Pacific Islander, 10% were Black, 10% were Latinx, and 5% were Indigenous. This transformation represents a great opportunity to swiftly accelerate acceptance of LGBTQ stories, break new ground, and invest in queer and trans talent and stories that audie Pnxo Florida hotel guest run over by forklift and killed during storm repairs
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Following a long and at times testy debate over the Confederate legacy, the North Carolina House on Monday gave tentative approval to <a href=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.fr>adidas samba</a> a controversial bill to protect historical monuments and memorials.The House voted mostly along party lines, 70-37, in favor of the <a href=https://www.nike-dunks.de>nike dunk</a> bill prohibiting the removal of objects of remembrance from public property. Three Democrats voted in favor of the bill and no Republicans voted against it, and it will go to the floor again Tuesday for further debate.Democrats tried unsuccessfully to <a href=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.it>adidas samba</a> place three amendments on the bill that would give local governments and the state historical commission more authority to remove or replace items falling under their jurisdiction. The bill s language protects any object that commemorates an event, person or military service that is part of North Carolina s history. Removing such an object would require an act of the General Assembly to be approved by the governor. Confederate flag removed from South Carolina Statehouse 02:19 Republicans said the intent of the bill s original sponsors in the Senate was to protect public monuments from the decisions of local authorities who might be more susceptible to basing their actions on shifting public opinion. They also stressed that the Senate passed the bill months before the de
Films from major studios included more LGBTQ characters onscreen for longer amounts of time in 2020 compared to the year prior, according to an annual study conducted by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation GLAAD . But the organization said there s still progress to be made, especially when it comes to transge <a href=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us>stanley cup</a> nder and bisexual representation.The 9th Annual Studio Responsibility Index included films from eight major studios: Lionsgate, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures, STX Films, United Artists Releasing, Universal Pictures, the Walt Disney Studios and Warner Bros.Of the 44 films those studios released in 2020, 22.7% included LGBTQ+ characters, a 4% increase from 2019. Though there were fewer LGBTQ characters overall mdash; 20 compared to 50 in 2019 mdash; the organization attributed that to the steep decline in fi <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.pl>stanley cup</a> lms released that year due to the coronavirus pandemic. Of the 20 characters, half spent ten minutes or more on screen, GLAAD said. Thirty percent logged under a minute.LGBTQ characters of color also incre <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley cup</a> ased their presence. Forty percent of the year s LGBTQ characters were people of color, an increase of 6% from the year prior. Fifteen percent were Asian-Pacific Islander, 10% were Black, 10% were Latinx, and 5% were Indigenous. This transformation represents a great opportunity to swiftly accelerate acceptance of LGBTQ stories, break new ground, and invest in queer and trans talent and stories that audie Pnxo Florida hotel guest run over by forklift and killed during storm repairs
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Following a long and at times testy debate over the Confederate legacy, the North Carolina House on Monday gave tentative approval to <a href=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.fr>adidas samba</a> a controversial bill to protect historical monuments and memorials.The House voted mostly along party lines, 70-37, in favor of the <a href=https://www.nike-dunks.de>nike dunk</a> bill prohibiting the removal of objects of remembrance from public property. Three Democrats voted in favor of the bill and no Republicans voted against it, and it will go to the floor again Tuesday for further debate.Democrats tried unsuccessfully to <a href=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.it>adidas samba</a> place three amendments on the bill that would give local governments and the state historical commission more authority to remove or replace items falling under their jurisdiction. The bill s language protects any object that commemorates an event, person or military service that is part of North Carolina s history. Removing such an object would require an act of the General Assembly to be approved by the governor. Confederate flag removed from South Carolina Statehouse 02:19 Republicans said the intent of the bill s original sponsors in the Senate was to protect public monuments from the decisions of local authorities who might be more susceptible to basing their actions on shifting public opinion. They also stressed that the Senate passed the bill months before the de
0