Eley Coburn Gets Best Of Reid On omnibus Package
Washington mdash; Democrats are fuming over the decision by Senate Republicans to move forward on a vote to confirm President Trump s yet-to-be-named nominee to the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg s death, four years after GOP leaders refused to hold a vote on a Democratic president s nominee during an election year.In 2016, Republicans in control of the Senate <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup becher</a> blocked President Obama s nominee to the court, Merrick Garland, from even receiving a hearing, leaving the Supreme Court with only eight justices for over a year. Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other Republican <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley vaso</a> s argue that the court must have nine justices ahead of the <a href=https://www.stanleycup.cz>stanley termohrnek</a> November election.Given the likely legal challenges accompanying the influx of mail-in ballots this year, it s possible that the fate of the election could fall to the Supreme Court, which would have a 6 to 3 conservative majority if Mr. Trump s nominee is confirmed before Election Day. Fury over what they see as rank hypocrisy from Republicans has led some Democrats to ponder options that recently were considered fringe ideas, most notably adding seats to the Supreme Court. Some progressives say expanding the court, an idea known as court packing, is the only way to restore balance to a body that has become overtly partisan.Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told members of his conference that nothing is off the table if Democrats retake the Senate, ind Hown Cruz: Trump will be worse than Obama
AP Leave it to Dick Cheney to teach Tareq Salahi a thing or two about how to crash a big event.On the eve of Barack Obama s most important address as pres <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cup</a> ident, Cheney managed to temporarily grab the spotlight when he told Politico that the commander in chief was weak and letting politics affect his military decisions. A sampler: Every time he delays, defers, debates, changes his position, it begins to raise questions: Is the commander in chief really behind what they ve been asked to do Or this gem: Here s a guy without much experience, who campaigned against much of what we put in place ... and who now travels around the world apologizing, Cheney said. I think our adversaries -- especially when that s preceded by a deep bow ... -- see that as a sign of weakness. Just why the ex-VP keeps popping off remains full-time fodder for the media, but Cheney s lo <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.at>stanley cup</a> oking more partisan with each headline that he makes. James Fallows is spot on when he notes the contrast with President George W. <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley website</a> Bush, who has maintained a dignified distance from public controversies and let the new team have its chance. He has acted as if aware that there are national interests larger than his own possible interests in score-settling or reputational-repair. I wonder how many of his former supporters would agree. The anger on the right seems deeper than anything expressed during the Clinton era. The timing was accidental but the former vice president s
Washington mdash; Democrats are fuming over the decision by Senate Republicans to move forward on a vote to confirm President Trump s yet-to-be-named nominee to the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg s death, four years after GOP leaders refused to hold a vote on a Democratic president s nominee during an election year.In 2016, Republicans in control of the Senate <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup becher</a> blocked President Obama s nominee to the court, Merrick Garland, from even receiving a hearing, leaving the Supreme Court with only eight justices for over a year. Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other Republican <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley vaso</a> s argue that the court must have nine justices ahead of the <a href=https://www.stanleycup.cz>stanley termohrnek</a> November election.Given the likely legal challenges accompanying the influx of mail-in ballots this year, it s possible that the fate of the election could fall to the Supreme Court, which would have a 6 to 3 conservative majority if Mr. Trump s nominee is confirmed before Election Day. Fury over what they see as rank hypocrisy from Republicans has led some Democrats to ponder options that recently were considered fringe ideas, most notably adding seats to the Supreme Court. Some progressives say expanding the court, an idea known as court packing, is the only way to restore balance to a body that has become overtly partisan.Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told members of his conference that nothing is off the table if Democrats retake the Senate, ind Hown Cruz: Trump will be worse than Obama
AP Leave it to Dick Cheney to teach Tareq Salahi a thing or two about how to crash a big event.On the eve of Barack Obama s most important address as pres <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cup</a> ident, Cheney managed to temporarily grab the spotlight when he told Politico that the commander in chief was weak and letting politics affect his military decisions. A sampler: Every time he delays, defers, debates, changes his position, it begins to raise questions: Is the commander in chief really behind what they ve been asked to do Or this gem: Here s a guy without much experience, who campaigned against much of what we put in place ... and who now travels around the world apologizing, Cheney said. I think our adversaries -- especially when that s preceded by a deep bow ... -- see that as a sign of weakness. Just why the ex-VP keeps popping off remains full-time fodder for the media, but Cheney s lo <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.at>stanley cup</a> oking more partisan with each headline that he makes. James Fallows is spot on when he notes the contrast with President George W. <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley website</a> Bush, who has maintained a dignified distance from public controversies and let the new team have its chance. He has acted as if aware that there are national interests larger than his own possible interests in score-settling or reputational-repair. I wonder how many of his former supporters would agree. The anger on the right seems deeper than anything expressed during the Clinton era. The timing was accidental but the former vice president s
0