Ugsy Coohills serves up French-inspired cuisine along Denver s Cherry Creek
DENVER 鈥?The U.S. <a href=https://www.adidassamba.com.de>adidas samba schuhe</a> Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday morning in the Colorado faithless electors case that could determine the future of the states laws binding electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in the state.The decision by <a href=https://www.adidas-yeezy.de>adidas yeezy</a> the eight justices 鈥?Sonia Sotomayor recused from the case because she is friends with one of the origin <a href=https://www.adidas-yeezys.com.mx>yeezy</a> al respondents in the lawsuit, Polly Baca 鈥?is expected by June and could have major ramifications for the 2020 General Election.Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser and attorneys for Equal Citizens, which are representing the electors, will make oral arguments over the phone, and the nations high court will stream the oral arguments live. Arguments in the Colorado case are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Wednesday 鈥?after another faithless electors case from the state of Washington is heard by the justices.The court will consider two questions in the case, Colorado Department of State v. Baca:路 Whether a presidential elector who is prevented by their appointing State from casting an Electoral College ballot that violates state law lacks standing to sue their appointing State because they hold no constitutionally protected right to exercise discretion.路 Does Article II or the Twelfth Amendment forbid a State from requiring its presidential electors to follow the States popular vote when casting their Electoral College ballots Attorneys for both sides will have one hour to make their oral arguments.The case stems Guuz Our Colorado: What s with all the storage facilities going up in Colorado
When the Capitol rio <a href=https://www.hokas.com.de>hoka laufschuhe</a> t happen <a href=https://www.airmaxplus.es>airmaxplus</a> ed, mainstream social media sites 鈥?like Twitter and Facebook 鈥?took action. VO Then-President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter permanently... and suspended from Facebook for at least two years. The social media company, now known as Meta, said it would re-assess the risk of violence near the end of Trumps suspension in January 2023.While getting Trump off the sites was an immediate reaction from social platforms, lawmakers have spent the last year looking into role that these social media sites might have played in the PLANNING OF the Capitol insurrection.In 2021, we saw big tech CEOs take the hot seat on Capitol Hill as U.S. lawmakers grilled them about the spread of misinformat <a href=https://www.airmaxplus.us>nike air max</a> ion... and how their sites enabled extremists. SOT JACK DORSEY | Former CEO, TwitterMarch 25, 2021lawmakers have to consider the broader ecosystem and not just technology platforms we use. SOT MARK ZUCKERBERG | CEO, MetaMarch 25, 2021 I believe that the former president should be responsible for his words and that the people who broke the law should be responsible for their actions Mark Zuckerberg caught a lot of heat for that comment, which critics saw as Facebook downplaying its role in the events of January 6th. And to put some numbers to all this, an investigation from ProPublica and our partners at The Washington Post, published earlier this week found during the period between Election Day and the Capitol riot, there were at least 650,000 posts in Facebook gr
DENVER 鈥?The U.S. <a href=https://www.adidassamba.com.de>adidas samba schuhe</a> Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday morning in the Colorado faithless electors case that could determine the future of the states laws binding electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in the state.The decision by <a href=https://www.adidas-yeezy.de>adidas yeezy</a> the eight justices 鈥?Sonia Sotomayor recused from the case because she is friends with one of the origin <a href=https://www.adidas-yeezys.com.mx>yeezy</a> al respondents in the lawsuit, Polly Baca 鈥?is expected by June and could have major ramifications for the 2020 General Election.Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser and attorneys for Equal Citizens, which are representing the electors, will make oral arguments over the phone, and the nations high court will stream the oral arguments live. Arguments in the Colorado case are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Wednesday 鈥?after another faithless electors case from the state of Washington is heard by the justices.The court will consider two questions in the case, Colorado Department of State v. Baca:路 Whether a presidential elector who is prevented by their appointing State from casting an Electoral College ballot that violates state law lacks standing to sue their appointing State because they hold no constitutionally protected right to exercise discretion.路 Does Article II or the Twelfth Amendment forbid a State from requiring its presidential electors to follow the States popular vote when casting their Electoral College ballots Attorneys for both sides will have one hour to make their oral arguments.The case stems Guuz Our Colorado: What s with all the storage facilities going up in Colorado
When the Capitol rio <a href=https://www.hokas.com.de>hoka laufschuhe</a> t happen <a href=https://www.airmaxplus.es>airmaxplus</a> ed, mainstream social media sites 鈥?like Twitter and Facebook 鈥?took action. VO Then-President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter permanently... and suspended from Facebook for at least two years. The social media company, now known as Meta, said it would re-assess the risk of violence near the end of Trumps suspension in January 2023.While getting Trump off the sites was an immediate reaction from social platforms, lawmakers have spent the last year looking into role that these social media sites might have played in the PLANNING OF the Capitol insurrection.In 2021, we saw big tech CEOs take the hot seat on Capitol Hill as U.S. lawmakers grilled them about the spread of misinformat <a href=https://www.airmaxplus.us>nike air max</a> ion... and how their sites enabled extremists. SOT JACK DORSEY | Former CEO, TwitterMarch 25, 2021lawmakers have to consider the broader ecosystem and not just technology platforms we use. SOT MARK ZUCKERBERG | CEO, MetaMarch 25, 2021 I believe that the former president should be responsible for his words and that the people who broke the law should be responsible for their actions Mark Zuckerberg caught a lot of heat for that comment, which critics saw as Facebook downplaying its role in the events of January 6th. And to put some numbers to all this, an investigation from ProPublica and our partners at The Washington Post, published earlier this week found during the period between Election Day and the Capitol riot, there were at least 650,000 posts in Facebook gr
0