4 weeks ago
#446029 Quote
Bqdy An appeal for the release of Milagro Sala
Being socially active in your 50s and 60s may help lower the risk of developing dementia in later life, a study has found.Researchers studied data that tracked more than 10,000 people from 1985 to 2013. The participants answered a questionnaire every five years about the frequency of their social contact with friends and relatives <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley shop</a> . They were also subject to cognitive testing, and electronic health records were searched for dementia diagnoses.The results 鈥?published in the journal Plos Medicine 鈥?showed that seeing friends almost daily at age 60 was associated with a 12% lower likelihood of developing dementia in later life, compared with those who saw only one or two friends every few months. Seeing relatives, on the other hand, did not show the same beneficial association.The authors suggest that practising using the brain for memory and language during social contact can build so-called cognitive reserve.Tara Spires-Jones, a professor of neurodegeneration at the University of Edinburgh who was not involved in the work, explained:  Learning new things builds connections between brain cells, and <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley becher</a>  so does social contact. The biology underlying this study is that the people who  <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.uk>stanley water bottle</a> are socially active keep their brains better connected. If you have a better connected network in your brain, it can resist pathology for longer. Clive Ballard, a professor of age-related disorders at the University of Exeter, who was also not involved in the work, said:  There are plenty of other studies Swry Islam4UK: what s in a name
The annual excitement that is the release of hitherto classified documents from the National Archives is upon us. This year an unusually high number have been withheld by the Cabinet Office. The reason given for continued secrecy is, of course, national security. When, I think we are all asking ourselves, is someone going to start tackling the problem of national insecurity, which is endemic The main thing  <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.fr>stanley cup</a> we have learned from this years cache is that Margaret Thatcher is indeed very much the person we thought she was. Having been defenestrated as prime minister by her erstwhile protege, John Major, Thatcher at first assumed she would be able to continue bossing him about as the power behind the throne. Major appears to have disabused her with some alacrity, using the fiendish strategy he seems to have applied to all things: not taking her too seriously.M <a href=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley cup</a> argaret Thatcher s aversion to pandas revealed by dec <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.pl>stanley cup</a> lassified papersRead moreMajors notes on national and international affairs are rather endearing. A 1992 coup attempt against Russian president Boris Yeltsin was greeted with:  Illegal coup. Calm. Put the clock back.  An attempt by the London School of Economics to annex County Hall in another illegal coup was quelled with a simple:  Barry. Hang on!  Annoyingly, however, it seems that Majors laidback strategy was wrong. National insecurity, among Guardian types anyway, has been given a good old stir with the news that Thatcher was definitely right about a number of issues.
0