2 weeks ago
#446777 Quote
Jmdt Lawyers question strength of Prince Andrew s response to lawsuit
Philip Inman gave a misleading account of the University and Col <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley quencher</a> lege Unions campaigns to defend university pensions and fight for job security and a manageable workload   Academics are fighting the wrong battle over pensions , Business . It is not correct to s <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es>stanley cup</a> uggest that we are focusing on the fight to save our pension scheme at the expense of seeking better working conditions and more secure contracts for university staff, especially junior staff. In fact, UCU and its predecessor unions have campaigned against the casualisation of higher education for more than three decades. We are running an industrial ballot covering this very issue as well as the work overload that so many university staff endure. One of our central demands is for the reduction in zero-hours contracts which Inman says the union should be asking for.On pensions, Inman claims that UC <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley cup usa</a> U is dissenting from an industry orthodoxy that guaranteed, defined benefit pensions are not sustainable. In fact, our concerns about the Universities Superannuation Scheme  USS  valuation process were corroborated by an independent panel of seven pensions experts, which found that USS could be funded with a much lower level of contributions than that previously proposed by USS itself. We remain convinced that support for defined benefits from employers is a question of priorities rather than practicality. A decent pension in retirement should be the right of every worker, not just those represented by UCU.Finally, Inman attrib Wyje Is the Human Rights Act dead
Big law firms work hard to project the illusion that life within them is a utopian combination of riches, intellectual stimulation and perfect work-li <a href=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley tumblers</a> fe balance.The seed of this idea is implanted through their graduate brochures and websites, which are typically plastered with images of glamorous cross-cultural encounters, alongside the occasional dolphin. It is then nurtured during the recruitment process, which begins at many firms this month with the acres of space on application forms devoted to  hobbies and interests   <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk>stanley cup</a> hinting that half a century of fun is just around the corner.Any doubts that a corporate legal career is not one long party are allayed by the multiple questions asked at the subsequent round of interviews about transferable skills acquired during gap-year surf trips and lazy afternoons playing the clarinet.What follows, of course, is a regime of dizzying hours, targets and hard <a href=https://www.stanley-germany.de>stanley thermoskanne</a> , often extremely dry, graft 鈥?exactly the sort of life, ironically, that the renaissance men and women attracted to the have-it-all image sold by big law firms would have been keen to avoid at all costs.There s a good reason for the smoke and mirrors: interesting, well-rounded individuals are better for business than legal nerds 鈥?smoother with clients, more likely to bring in business, less inclined to get stressed juggling heavy workloads.The downside of this cunning, if somewhat dysfunctional, recruitment strategy is that it means corporate law firms are full of people
0